Page 54 - Red Hill Farms Red Angus and Simmental Annual Bull Sale 2017
P. 54

2017 – Red Hill Farms                      Red Angus Reference Sires






















                REDHILL T189 MEDAL 176A     BUF CRK NICE’N EASY T189
                                            REDHILL 126T 287 182W
           100%  1A     #1670037 [MAF OSF]   TATTOO: 176A 1BWJ   CALVED: 9/8/13
           HB   GM CED BW   WW  YW  MILK  ME  HPG  CEM  STAY  MARB   YG   CW  REA   FAT
          185  49 12  -4.6  53 79  26   -4  17   2   18  0.39  0.03  10  0.07  0.02
          1% 40% 6%  7%  65% 68% 17% 20% 2%  77%  1%  52%  59% 79% 55%  83%
        176A is our choice of T189 sons produced to date. He has been a standout in every phase of production. He
        was used naturally at Red Hill Farms in the fall of 2014 and bred extremely well in the pasture. 176A excels
        in all performance traits in addition to having excellent structural soundness and adaptability to our fescue
        environment. 176A is more balanced and eye appealing in his design than his sire.
        We have used 176A heavily in our breeding program. His fi rst calves look outstanding and will sell in our
        2017 sale “More than a Bull XII.”  His daughters are a great set of replacements. The calves observed at B
        Lazy T Ranch last summer also appeared to be a very strong set of calves.
        176A’s dam, 182W, has produced four exceptional calves – an 84S daughter we retained, an 84S son that
        was the top selling bull in 2014, 176A and a 157Y son that sold in 2016. Her ratios are BW 4/102, WW 4/105
        and YW 4/105. 182W was fl ushed in the fall of 2014 and 2015.  Watch for many more progeny in the future.
        176A is owned with B Lazy T Ranch (SD), Grill Cattle Company (SD), and Fick Red Angus (NE).






          “Take a look at the largest, most successful commercial operations and you’ll fi nd
          crossbreeding is the standard rather than the exception as they exploit maternal het-
          erosis to increase production, but mostly in order to reduce cost. Rather than focus
          on pounds, they focus on the cost per pound of production, relative to the possible
          revenue per pound.”
              Matt Spangler, Ph.D., beef geneticist, University of Nebraska-Lincoln

        52 – Red Hill Farms
   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59